O
Prince George's County
← Community
ZoningCommunity discussion

CB-019-2026 data centers

Prince George's County

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (5)Opposed (1)Concerned (1)

At a glance

Public comments
7
Last 30 days
6

Discussed at 2 meetings in the last 60 days; most recently Oct 27, 2026.

Public comments (7)

SupportiveJanet GingoldOct 27, 2026

Supported the bill but said it is not comprehensive; urged no data centers by right, no NDAs, no tax breaks, and full disclosure of energy and water use.

County Council - Oct 27, 2026 · 2:59:24 →
SupportiveBeth LandryOct 27, 2026

Representing CCAN Action Fund, supported the bill and said the Landover data center should not proceed under old permitting standards.

County Council - Oct 27, 2026 · 16:30 →
SupportiveHenry WixonOct 27, 2026

Representing the Glendale Citizens Association, supported the bill's vested rights provision requiring real construction before rights vest.

County Council - Oct 27, 2026 · 20:18 →
SupportiveTaylor Frazier McCollumOct 27, 2026

District 5 resident urging passage, citing the Landover project's proximity to a children's hospital, energy and water demands, and a 25,000-signature petition.

County Council - Oct 27, 2026 · 21:43 →
OpposedAlexander AustinOct 27, 2026

Prince George's Chamber of Commerce president opposed the bill, citing regulatory overreach and barriers to economic development on top of the existing moratorium.

County Council - Oct 27, 2026 · 24:31 →
SupportiveKevin (Unidentified last name)Oct 27, 2026

District 2 resident supporting the bill and urging an outright permanent ban on hyperscale data centers, citing WSSC water infrastructure failures.

County Council - Oct 27, 2026 · 25:30 →
ConcernedBeth LandrySep 17, 2026

Asked the committee to confirm the bill does not put the hyperscale data center moratorium at risk; the chair confirmed it does not.

Planning, Housing and Economic Development Committee - Sep 17, 2026 · 33:02 →