Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 7
- Last 30 days
- 6
Discussed at 2 meetings in the last 60 days; most recently Oct 27, 2026.
Public comments (7)
Supported the bill but said it is not comprehensive; urged no data centers by right, no NDAs, no tax breaks, and full disclosure of energy and water use.
County Council - Oct 27, 2026 · 2:59:24 →Representing CCAN Action Fund, supported the bill and said the Landover data center should not proceed under old permitting standards.
County Council - Oct 27, 2026 · 16:30 →Representing the Glendale Citizens Association, supported the bill's vested rights provision requiring real construction before rights vest.
County Council - Oct 27, 2026 · 20:18 →District 5 resident urging passage, citing the Landover project's proximity to a children's hospital, energy and water demands, and a 25,000-signature petition.
County Council - Oct 27, 2026 · 21:43 →Prince George's Chamber of Commerce president opposed the bill, citing regulatory overreach and barriers to economic development on top of the existing moratorium.
County Council - Oct 27, 2026 · 24:31 →District 2 resident supporting the bill and urging an outright permanent ban on hyperscale data centers, citing WSSC water infrastructure failures.
County Council - Oct 27, 2026 · 25:30 →Asked the committee to confirm the bill does not put the hyperscale data center moratorium at risk; the chair confirmed it does not.
Planning, Housing and Economic Development Committee - Sep 17, 2026 · 33:02 →