V-14-26 driveway variance

Strongly opposed, alleging the property has had multiple unpermitted modifications and operates as an unlicensed rooming house, and that the widened driveway would devalue nearby homes.

Opposed the driveway widening as a safety hazard for children on a narrow street and said the widened pavement would be an eyesore out of character with the neighborhood.

The petitioner's daughter testified in support, explaining the driveway was damaged when her mother bought the house and that neighbors confront her when she parks on the street.